Late this week Judicial Watch finally received a response to its Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) request for:
“All records related to the meeting between Attorney General Lynch and former President Bill Clinton on June 27, 2016,” among other requests.
We say finally because the request was filed on July 7, 2016, just ten days after Obama’s attorney general Loretta Lynch violated federal law by meeting with Hillary Clinton’s husband, former president Bill Clinton.
Contained in the 29-page release was an acknowledgement that Bill Clinton went out of his way to “maneuver” the meeting. This confirms the report by the Observer on July 1, 2016, only four days after that meeting took place that ran under the headline:
EXCLUSIVE: Security Source Details Bill Clinton Maneuver to Meet Loretta Lynch
The sub headline added this information:
Former president delayed Phoenix takeoff to snare ’20-25 minute encounter’ with Attorney General
Shockingly, there was a flurry of email activity showing that the FBI was more concerned about silencing the unnamed security source than upholding the law. The emails exchanged by FBI officials contain proof that a cover up was underway. From Judicial Watch:
“We need to find that guy’ and that the Phoenix FBI office was contacted ‘in an attempt to stem any further damage.’ Another FBI official, working on AG Lynch’s security detail, suggests instituting non-disclosure agreements. The names of the emails authors are redacted. There are no documents showing concern about the meeting itself.”
Keep in mind that only 8 days after the June 27th meeting took place, fired FBI director James Comey held his infamous press conference during which he made the ridiculous claim that “no reasonable prosecutor would seek an indictment” against Mrs. Clinton after laying out a case that included crimes punishable by, in total, hundreds of years in prison.
The criminal co-conspirators that surrounded Mrs. Clinton and aided and abetted her were allowed to destroy evidence and were given immunity from prosecution. Why did they need immunity if they were innocent?
Almost a year after Comey’s cover up he told the Senate Judiciary Committee:
“A number of things had gone on which I can’t talk about yet, that made me worry that the department leadership could not credibly complete the investigation and decline prosecution without grievous damage to the American people’s confidence in the justice system.
“And then the capper was — and I’m not picking on the attorney general, Loretta Lynch, who I like very much — but her meeting with President Clinton on that airplane was the capper for me, and I then said, you know what, the department cannot, by itself, credibly end this.”
WAT??? When Comey made this statement on May 3, 2017 President Trump had already won the election so why couldn’t he talk about it? That is unless he was working with Trump’s deep state Deep State opponents who were determined to derail his nascent presidency because it threatens their illegal hold over our government.
Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton released this statement after reviewing the newly released emails:
“These new FBI documents show the FBI was more concerned about a whistleblower who told the truth about the infamous Clinton-Lynch tarmac meeting than the scandalous meeting itself. The documents show the FBI worked to make sure no more details of the meeting would be revealed to the American people. No wonder the FBI didn’t turn these documents over until Judicial Watch caught the agency red-handed hiding them. These new documents confirm the urgent need to reopen the Clinton email scandal and criminally investigate the resulting Obama FBI/DOJ sham investigation.”
In light of all of this evidence is there anyone left who still questions why Trump fired Comey?